Friday, May 16, 2014

Absolute Monarchs By: James Webster



Louis XIV of France (Ruled from 1643 – 1715)


Louis XIV of France is a very good example of an Absolute Monarch. He was announced King at the young age of three and was the Monarch of the House of Bourbon and he was the King of France. Things that make Louis XIV an Absolute Monarch is the way that he lead his people and did things the way that he wanted them done. He created a centralized state governed from the capital and this is a major aspect of him being a Absolute Monarch. His power reigned in The country of France for a little over 72 years. This was the longest time being a Monarch than any other rulers in the European countries. Overall the power that Louis XIV had on France during the 72 years that he lead gave him the title of being a Absolute Monarch.




Ivan IV of Russia (Ruled from 1547 – 1584)


       Ivan IV of Russia is another great example of an Absolute Monarch. He was commonly referred to as Ivan the Terrible because of the way that he ruled. He ruled about 1,562,500 sq. miles and he very good at conquering land.  He was a very powerful man and and the way he ruled changed Russia completely. He was so powerful that he changed Russia from its medieval state to a very sustainable empire. Along with that he also changed all of the Russia's into being made up of multiple ethnic groups with different religious beliefs. This is what makes Ivan IV of Russia a very good example of an Absolute Monarch. If he were to lose the land and the people that he lead then he would no longer be a Absolute Monarch because he would not do the things that make him a Absolute Monarch.



 Philip II of Spain (Ruled from 1556 – 1598)       


       Phillip II of Spain is another fine example of An Absolute Monarch. He showed great power through the many countries and places that he showed importance in. He was not only a Monarch to Spain but was also a leader to England, Sicily, Naples, and he was also Duke of Milan. Philip II is known for the huge naval expedition called the spanish armada. He was also lord of the seven provinces of the Netherlands. During the time that Philip II ruled there were many bankruptcies in the major places that Philip II. By this all happening if thing had not been fixed then his aspect of being a Absolute Monarch could have been ruined.




Henry VIII of England (Ruled from 1509 – 1547)


Henry VIII was king of England and later pronounced as Lord and Kingship of Ireland. Henry VIII portrays what it means to be an Absolute Monarch by the things he did in England that set him aside from most of the other people. He split up and separated the Church of England from the Pope and he separated the Roman Catholic Church as well. He later named himself as the Supreme Head of the Church and he caused the Dissolution of the monasteries. He also made and changed many laws in England to satisfy what he wanted. If he had not been in rule of all that he was than he would not had been under the category of being an Absolute leader.




Emperor Zhu Di of China (Ruled from 1402 – 1424)



Emperor Zhu DI was first established as the prince of Yan. He was later made the Emperor of the Ming Dynasty. He was a very important leader and the things he did in the Ming Dynasty caused him to be an Absolute Monarch. He constructed buildings such as the Porcelain tower of Nanjing and he also opened the canal up. He had began work on the Forbidden City. He expanded the imperial examination system like what his father had started. All these aspects of what made Zhu Di an Absolute Monarch are very centered to him. If theses things hadn't have happened then he would not have been called an Absolute Monarch.


Absolute Monarchy - Leighton Luther

          Frederick II or Frederick the Great was known to be a famous German ruler and spent a lot of time with his military. Although he was big on military, his main focus after he became leader of Prussia was to expand it majorly and to reform. He saw his first way to impact the expansion by making an invasion on Austria, which then led to a treaty which he did not like. His military mind mind is what really started this whole expansion into a bigger country. He made Prussia one of the best European Countries by giving the princes a place in the governmental bureaucracy. Another big impact that he had on Prussia to make it a better place for all of his people. He was an absolute monarch because he made his laws of what the people should be able to do and what they should not be able to do. He made torturing disappear and death sentences unless he approved them which made him and absolute monarch. When he enforced general education rules across Prussia he really changed and turned it in to one of the strongest European countries. It did not just shape Prussia, but also left it to the next ruler who shaped Germany. 


          Louis XIV became king after his father died. He inherited a very powerful country. He wanted it to stay that way by being an absolute monarch, which he did first by keeping his military well trained and made  his empire by invading to gain more control of land. Louis wanted to gain control over the Spanish Netherlands. He did end up making small victories over places that can be called good places, however the Dutch always wanted to make an alliance on the power and equality of Europe. Louis was head of a Catholic Church in France which had people called Huguenots. Louis made them change to Catholicism or he would send them to jail


          Phillip II was a very demanding head of Spain. He was eager to make things his way and soon began to change Spain. Phillip at one point was ordering murders. He developed a system for himself and his absolute monarchy, it was a regional self government system. Phillip sent Alva to the the Netherlands to start the revolt there and it did not succeed, so he sent another force over there to take of that land. When Phillip started ordering murders he passed it on to other people and became an impact on other people. A man named Antonio Perez started using the murder to kill political opponents so Phillip had to order an arrest and put him in jail.  



          Ivan IV of Russia was also known as Ivan "The Terrible." He got this name by killing own son because his country , Russia lost a war. He made a poor decision because after he killed his son he could only make his son who was mentally handicapped to be king. Not only did he kill his son, but he even made his wife have a miscarriage by beating her while she was pregnant. Ivan did this because he thought his wife was wearing ugly clothes. He was then executed by many clans for his actions upon his family. He was crowned the Tsar of Russia because know one else took over. He built the St. Basil Cathedral and conquered vast territories to make Russia a very good place for years to come. As you can tell he was absolute monarch because did at one point have complete control over his people.


          Akbar the Great was one of the greatest known emperors of the Mughal empire. He kept the Mughal empire up and running all over the Indian sub continent. Akbar had to do a lot of work to keep up his empire like centralizing the financial system and reorganized tax selection processing. He was an absolute monarch in many ways, but we knew this because he was the one who told his people what religion to practice. Akbar created a powerful army and instituted social reforms. By lowering these taxes her earned the loyalty and trust for the emperor to do this. He really helped the Hindus by lowering the taxes, participating in festivals, and realized that it brought his empire stronger than ever. His military got stronger and stronger over longer periods of time with a leader that put lots of time in to train them. He tried to bring many other holy men and poets to him and start changing them to Hindus. Akbar really loved helping his people and telling them what do because he had control over them. He was the kind of ruler that helped his people out with the power that he had. He did not use it to be cruel.

Alex Baugh - Absolute Monarchs


     The theory of Absolutism has been around since the earliest recorded leaderships. Almost every civilization at one time was ruled by someone who had total power. Whether that power was used to benefit or hurt that civilization depends on the ruler and how they chose to rule. While some rulers when given absolute power would, and did abuse this power, others used it to help their people. Complete power held by a single monarch can lead to negative results, however when given to the right leader, power can lead to tremendous growth and efficiency within a civilization. 


     Some rulers when given power choose to use it for growth. Frederick William I, for example, came into power in Prussia and used his leadership to change the country's image. Frederick William was born in 1688 and took the throne of Prussia after his father died in 1713. After taking complete power becoming the sole monarch of Prussia, he focused on the military aspect of his country. He made his one and only goal to find suitable soldiers from all around the world to expand his army. One in every nine men in Prussia were in the army. Frederick commanded extreme discipline from his soldiers. In creating this discipline, Frederick found only the highest quality commanders to lead his armies. Frederick also tried to improve the quality of life for his citizens in Prussia. He freed the serfs and replaced the previous war service tax with a yearly tax. When Frederick died in 1740, he left his country with the third largest army and most disciplined army of the time.

     The ruler Peter I, or 'Peter the Great', of Russia was proclaimed Tsar at the age of ten. His rule was focused on expansion and trade. After his victory in war against Sweden he established trade along the Baltic sea. Peter opened up to the west and let in many influences, helping to modernize Russia.This led to an increase in the arts and education in Russia. While Peter did help his country become more modernized, he also could be a cruel leader. When revolts were led against him, he responded by putting them down and conducting mass executions. These acts of cruelty were some of the misuses of power that were inevitable in an absolute monarchy.

     The French ruler Louis XIV was a man who used his power as monarch to create a cultural dominance over the rest of Europe. Louis helped catapult French culture forward through arts, literature, and science. He also expanded other cultural aspects such as manufacturing, technology/engineering, and academics. Louis, the self proclaimed 'Sun King', used loyalty and religion to gain the favor of his people. By using religion, however, Louis XIV caused the decline of his greatly established reign. Louis wanted to create religious uniformity throughout France. In trying to create this, he would not allow protestants to practice their religion. He forced protestants to convert and those who did not were killed. This is another example of the misuse of power caused by an excessive amount of power with one man.
   
     Ferdinand II of Spain is another ruler who had absolute power over his people. Ferdinand used this power for the expansion of Spain. Ferdinand was the leader of Spain that funded Christopher Columbus' voyage to the America's. This decision was made in order to help strengthen Spain's economy, allowing commercial shipping overseas. Ferdinand also used his religious beliefs to expand Spain. When Ferdinand took power in 1479, Muslims occupied much of the Iberian Peninsula. Ferdinand was driven by his strong Christian faith to spur a 10-year struggle to force the Muslims out and take the land for Spain. This is an example of how religion has an influence on how monarchs use their power.

      The Indian leader Akbar The Great was one of the most extraordinary rulers of India. Akbar used his power to increase cultural growth and the expansion of his empire. Akbar influenced the growth of architecture, art, and literature. Akbar was an absolute monarch who used his power to benefit his people and improve his country.

     The effects of an absolute monarchy have the potential to be extremely beneficial to the country. However, "With great power comes great responsibility." And when given absolute power, there is a possibility that someone would misuse that power. Examples of great leaders in history used the power that they had to benefit the country. But what leads to the downfall of an absolute monarchy is the abuse of complete power.


Works Cited:

"Akbar The Great." Akbar. N.p., n.d. Web. May 2014.

 "Biography of Frederick William I the Soldier King of Prussia (1657-1713)." Biography of Frederick William I the Soldier King of Prussia (1657-1713). N.p., n.d. Web. May 2014.

"Creating French CultureThe Rise and Fall of the Absolute Monarchy." The Rise and Fall of the Absolute Monarchy. N.p., n.d. Web. May 2014.

The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Frederick William I (king of Prussia)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. May 2014.

"Ferdinand and Isabella." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. May 2014.

"Frederick William IV, King of Prussia." Frederick William IV, King of Prussia. N.p., n.d. Web. May 2014.

"Peter the Great." Peter the Great. N.p., n.d. Web. May 2014.

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Absolute Monarchy

           Power is useless to have unless you also have control. People tend to assume that if someone is in a high position of authority, then they also have control.Throughout history, people who have been in power have failed to demonstrate control over what they had or themselves. Phillip II of Spain, Louis XIV of France, Charles I of England, Ivan IV of Russia, and Akbar of India are rulers of absolute monarchs and their management of control  affected if their kingdom failed or notAn absolute monarchy is a form of government in which the ruler has complete power over the people. Although the rulers of absolute monarchs have complete power over their kingdoms, that does not necessarily mean that they have control over their kingdoms or themselves.
Phillip II of Spain
          Phillip II of Spain believed in divine right, which is the belief that a ruler has the entitlement of their position because it is the will of God. Phillip II was also a devout Catholic, and he considered all ideas of the Protestant faith to be rebellious. Since Phillip II believed in divine right he had thousands of Protestants and heretics burned to death. Phillip II ultimately failed at wiping out the Protestant faith in the Netherlands, but that did not stop his ambitious quest of getting rid of the faith. Phillip II essentially began fighting wars against people of the Catholic faith and people of the Protestant faith. Spain, during the time of Phillip II reign, was flourishing economically, but because of the constant religious wars Phillip II insisted on fighting, the economy of Spain slowly began to decline resulting in bankruptcy. Since Phillip II could not control himself in fighting religious wars, he ended up causing his country to go into bankruptcy.
Louis XIV of France
Charles I of England
         Louis XIV, known as "the Sun King", ruled France from 1643 to 1715 which is the longest reign in European history. Louis XIV was an exceptional leader when it came to promoting the arts, however he failed to sustain his exceptional ability when it came to self control. Louis XIV ruled with an iron fist and had complete power over his land. Louis XIV, like Phillip II, fought many wars mainly over land distribution disputes. As a result of the multiple wars Louis XIV got involved in, France went bankrupt. Like Louis XIV, Charles I of England ruled with an iron fist and tried to enforce rules regardless of what the public thought. Charles I also believed he had the divine right to do what he thought was best. In 1628, the English Parliament passed the "Petition of Right". The Petition of Right was a law that prohibited the king from acts such as unjust imprisonment and imposing taxes without permission from Parliament. In 1629, Charles I decided to terminate Parliament and break one of the rights by imposing taxes on the people. In a result to Charles I disregard for the people he lost control of the people because they began to rebel.  
Ivan IV of Russia
Akbar
         Ivan IV of Russia, commonly known as Ivan the Terrible, was a cruel tyrant who would do anything to get what he wanted. Ivan IV was called "Ivan the Terrible" because of his cruelness and his temper. Ivan IV despised treason and had anyone who was accused of this crime brutally tortured and killed. Ivan IV did not know how to control his temper, therefore historians have labeled him as a harsh tyrant that was "terrible." Akbar of India, know as "Akbar the Great", is an example of a leader of an absolute monarch that had 
control. Although Akbar the Great was a ruler of an absolute monarch, he still listened to the input of the people and kept in mind what their specific needs were. As a result of Akbar the Great's control, he increased his land, satisfied the people, and became known as someone who was great.

                Absolute monarchies are dependent on how the leaders rule. Leaders of absolute monarchies must have control over their power, otherwise it results in an unsuccessful kingdom. Phillip II of Spain, Louis XIV of France, Charles I of England, and Ivan IV of Russia displayed a lack of control in their monarchies. These rulers were given all the power they just did not control what they had. Akbar of India knew how to control the power he had which resulted in him running a successful kingdom. No matter how much power is given, control will always be vital in an absolute monarchy.


Works Cited
"The Age of Akbar." N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part2_11.html>.
"Charles I of England and Scotland, King and Martyr." N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/92.html>.
"Charles I of England." N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Charles_I_of_England.html>.
Cherniavsky, Michael. "Ivan the Terrible as Renaissance Prince." N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://www2.stetson.edu/~psteeves/classes/cherniavsky.html>.
Damerow, Harold. "Louis XIV Outline." N.p., n.d. Web. 12 May 2014. <http://faculty.ucc.edu/egh-damerow/louis_xiv.htm>.
Haarman, Susan. "Absolute Terror: Ivan the Terrible." N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://academic.mu.edu/meissnerd/ivan-terrible.htm>.
Halsall, Paul. "The Rise of Absolutism." N.p., n.d. Web. 11 May 2014. <http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/lect/mod04.html>.
"Phillip II and Government." History Learning Site. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 May 2014. <http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/PhillipII_government.htm>.

Spielvogel, Jackson J. "The Theory of Absolutism." N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www2.stetson.edu/~psteeves/classes/louisxiv.html>.








Austin Lu Absolutism Final Project

     There are many rulers, monarchs, kings, or leaders in the world that have their own view of how they should rule their empires. One particular type of leadership was the practice and following of absolutism. An absolute monarch or leader is one who rules for god and only god. Absolute monarchs also attempt to expand their territories and will do anything to make that happen. There have been some well known absolute monarchs in past european and asian history like, Maximilian, Queen Elizabeth I, Louis XIV, Ivan the terrible, and Akbar. All these rulers follow the model of absolutism. All the rulers have attempted to expand their territories, or at least weakened the surrounding empires, and have done a little extra action to make expansion possible.
     Maximilian was known as the king of Hungary but he is also known for forming Austria. As the king of Hungary Maximilian had fought in many wars and battles to claim several territories to expand his country as a normal absolute ruler would. Maximilian spoke seven languages which made negotiating a lot easier. Maximilian had claimed several territorial holdings for the habsburgs in his early rule. These territories include Netherlands, Spain, Hungary, Bohemia, and the Spanish Empire. Maximilian was later then imprisoned in Bruges and lost the territory of Netherlands. Maximilian, as an absolute monarch, could not accept the fact that he had lost a piece of his empire that he had gained control and had to find his way out of imprisonment. Maximilian made several concessions to the state and the generals to release him. Bruges finally released Maximilian and he later regained control of the Netherlands from his brother. Negotiating his way out of imprisonment was not the only "extreme" he went to for gaining land. Maximilian also married wives that would help him show his power or help him to gain control of more territories. One example of this is his second wife Bianca Maria Sforza. Maximilian married Bianca because it would help to heal the relationship between him and Italy. Once Maximilian had a better relationship with Italy he tried to recapture Milan. Maximilian had already invested in many wars before the invasion of Milan and he had to borrow money to hire soldiers for the invasion. Maximilian did not follow the religious side of an absolute monarch as much as Queen Elizabeth I did. Maximilian could have been dethroned for not pleasing the people of his country with religious guidance, which was pretty important to a absolute monarch.
     Queen Elizabeth I was the queen of England after her brother and her sister Bloody Mary. Queen Elizabeth I, as an absolute monarch, ruled for god and only god more than land, whereas Maximilian ruled for mainly land. Queen Elizabeth I's sister, Bloody Mary became known as a Roman Catholic. After her sister died, Queen Elizabeth I first decided to let Roman Catholics exist in England but later they saw their end. Queen Elizabeth also was accused of many assassinations, this could have been enough for the people to over rule and assassinate her like Julius Caesar was, but one that was true was Queen Elizabeth I did assassinate Mary Stuart, the queen of Scots. Although Queen Elizabeth I ruled mainly for religious purposes, she assassinated Mary Stuart to take away the chance that Mary Stuart might have taken Queen Elizabeth I position. After Queen Elizabeth I assassinated Mary Stuart, Spain attempted an invasion on England. Spain was one of the biggest threats to England because they were considered as the Royal Navy. England successfully defend Spain and was then considered to be the new Royal Navy. This was one of the few times that Queen Elizabeth tried to expand her empire rather to rule for god and god only. Louis XIV ruling style was a mix between Queen Elizabeth I and Maximilian, but he was still an absolute ruler.
     Louis XIV was the king of France and he ruled for both god and for territorial expansion. Louis XIV claims that his power was inherited and derived from God. Louis XIV was devout catholic but he saw himself as the head of the Catholic Church. Louis XIV decided to revoke the Edict of Nantes which gave a tolerance for different religious followers in France. Following the revoked edict Louis XIV forced all Huguenots to convert to catholicism. Louis XIV ruled France with a very strict religion and also with a strong territorial expansion goal in mind. He was a very smart leader and hired a finance minister to help strengthen his economy. Louis XIV finance minister helped his economy so much that he was able to give out monopolies and have tariffs. The tariffs and the monopolies made the country so wealthy that he was able to raise the taxes if he needed to. Behind all the money and the wealth France had earned most of it was about to be spent on upcoming wars. Louis XIV became pretty lucky that the people of France did not rebel against him for all his large taxes and tariffs. Louis XIV attempted to take the Spanish Netherlands and the Dutch Republic with all the money that he had collected. He later then try to invade Spain. Louis XIV lost that war and almost took the country in to bankruptcy. Ivan the terrible had a very similar ruling style as Louis XIV had.
     Ivan the terrible was the czar of Russia at very young and trough some very tough times. Ivan the terrible was born when his father was still in rule. Three years later Ivan's father died and declared that Ivan would become ruler at the age of fifteen. Before Ivan was ruler, his mother had the throne for a few years and later she died too. After his mother, the Boyars had power over Russia and paid no attention to Ivan unless there was a ceremony involving him. Ivan and his brother were neglected and mistreated very often and were starved. After years had past Ivan had ordered a meeting with the Boyars and dethroned them. After the meting with the Boyars Ivan was crowned czar of Russia. Ivan was still too young to make his own decisions so two of his uncles handled the administrative work. Ivan later found out that his uncles were mistreating the Boyars and dethroned them as well. Even when Ivan was young he still had power, but his young age could have take him for the worse and he might have not become czar of Russia. Ivan was very religious to points where he even had many confessions in public of his sins in Moscow. Ivan also tried to expand his territory, as a normal absolute monarch would. At the end of his rule Ivan had expanded Russia by one million kilometers. Ivan had to act abnormally to expand Russia that much. He had to force the Boyars and the princes to be in the calvary because he had lost many soldiers in previous wars. Akbar the Great was not quite like Ivan the terrible or Even Maximilian. Akbar was very religious like Queen Elizabeth I.
     Akbar the great was the ruler of India and ruled mainly for god and god only. Akbar the great built the House of Worship in the new capital that he had found, Sikri. Ivan the great was very religious he went to the House of Worship very often and he rewrote laws to make his citizens happy. Akbar did try to expand his territory and succeeded at some of his attacks but he also weakened many fortresses and was shy of victory. This gave an advantage to the empires that he attacked because if the fortresses were only weakened the empires knew his attack strategies. This big pitfall did not seem to matter to his villagers because he pleased almost everyone of them and Akbar was well known for that. Akbar was also well known for the blending of different cultures and societies. Akbar had different architecture designs that were in his new capital. He also was very involved in the arts and academic subjects. Akbar the great is not a typical absolute monarch but he did whatever it took to make his people happy.



                                                                       Works Cited


"Absolutism and Revolution." Absolutism and Revolution. N.p., 3 Dec. 2010. Web. 13 May 2014. <http://www.slideshare.net/akashag11111/absolutism-and-revolution>.

Damerow, Harold, Dr. "Louis XIV." Louis XIV. Senior Professor of Government and History, 10 Oct. 2009. Web. 13 May 2014. <http://faculty.ucc.edu/egh-damerow/louis_xiv.htm>.

Harrman, Susan. "Absolute Terror: Ivan the Terrible (And You Thought Your Nickname Was Bad. . .)." N.p., n.d. Web. 14 May 2014. <http://academic.mu.edu/meissnerd/ivan-terrible.htm>.

"Maximilian I." World History: Ancient and Medieval Eras. ABC-CLIO, 2014. Web. 13 May 2014.

"Part2_11." Part2_11. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 May 2014. <http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part2_11.html>.

"Queen Elizabeth I of England." Queen Elizabeth I of England. MMV Prof. Pavlac's Women's History Site, 7 Dec. 2005. Web. 14 May 2014. <http://departments.kings.edu/womens_history/elizabeth.html>.

Absolute Monarchs



Absolute Monarchs


Absolute monarchy is a type of government in which the monarch has absolute power over the people but absolute monarchs need support from the aristocrats. The power of the monarch was not limited by law but at the same time it is not completely totalitarian. The key components of absolutism are strong central governments, a strong military to fight wars and a strong economy that strengthens the power of the government. The basic, condensed idea of Absolutism is power and control. How a ruler uses this power is what determines how they excel as a leader. 

Ivan The Terrible


Ivan IV, better known as Ivan the Terrible, became czar of Russia in in 1547.  He was an absolute monarch with a wild temper who killed many of his advisors including his son.
In 1556, Ivan exerted control over the boyars and princes who still held private lands in Muscovy by requiring them and their personal slave soldiers to serve in the cavalry as well. By forcing them into the "service class," Ivan took away the Russian nobility's independence. Peasants were tuned into surfs as their lands were turned over to the servicemen and they were forced to not leave the lands.
The title Ivan was given was the term Grozny, which was interpreted to mean terrible, but in actuality translates to awesome. However despite the fact that Ivan’s title was simply a translation error, many of the things he did indicated that he was indeed terrible. This nature became evident after the death of his beloved wife, he fell prey to the mental issues he had always battled with. His suspicion deepened into paranoia he became angry and depressed, with his old cruelty resurfacing. Ivan often had violent fits of temper and feelings of remorse.  Because of all this, in 1564, Ivan decided to leave his home in Moscow to visit a series of monasteries. Shortly after he returned in 1565, Ivan set up the Oprichniki, which became a separate police state within Russia. They dressed in black, the traditional colors of death, and rode black horses, from whose saddle hung two emblems - those of a broom and a dog's head. The broom signified the rider's mission to sweep Russia clean of Ivan's enemies; the dog's head symbolized that he was watchful for the czar.
Ivan the Terrible also had a strong desire to rule over more people, another trait of Absolute Monarchs. Looking to further expand his empire, Ivan targeted Livonia, a small, Baltic-coast nation in 1558.  He expanded Russia by annexing non-Russian lands in the Volga region and areas east of the Volga in the Urals and Siberia. Siberian natural resources were abundant however Russia’s economy or trade did not improve significantly under his rule. Farmers fled their farms because of the terrors of the Oprichniki and forests took over. 

Maria Theresa


Unlike Ivan the Terrible, Maria Theresa used her power to the benefit of her country. In 1740, 23 year old Maria Theresa took the throne of Austria to become the 1st female Hapsburg ruler. While her enmity with Prussia led to the 7 year war in which the countries involved were the same as the war of Austrian succession. The war took place in Europe, North America and India. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 ended the war and Prussia retained Silesia which angered her. Peace was established between Prussia and Austria with the 1st partition of Poland in which Poland was divided into 3 parts, one part each going to Prussia, Austria and Russia.
She improved the Austrian economy by ending trade barriers between Austria and Bohemia and modifying the tax system. She strengthened the army by doubling the number of troops from her father's reign, reorganized the tax structure to insure a predictable annual income to support the costs of the government and army, and centralized an office to assist in the collection of the taxes.
Maria Theresa was courageous, generous and kind. She respected the rights of others and expected others to respect her rights. In the later part of her rule, the empress focused more on human concerns, and less on financial and administrative improvements. She became increasingly involved with the problem of serf reform. Throughout the empire, the peasants were obligated to pay monetary and work dues to their lords. In 1771, Maria Theresa issued the Robot Patent, the serf reform designed to regulate the peasants' labor payments in all of the Habsburg lands.

Louis XIV  


Louis XIV is another example of an absolute monarch who greatly ruined the state of his empire with his hunger for power. However, in contrast to Ivan the Terrible it was his own cockiness that led to his downfall- sounds a bit like something straight out of a Shakespeare play, doesn't it.  Some examples of this are how he tried to raise revenues by collecting taxes in cooperation with the aristocracy. He called himself the Sun King and believed that his power was so absolute that he would say  “L’etat, c’est moi.” Or “I Am The State”. Under his rule the state encouraged economic productivity through the granting of monopolies tariffs on foreign products, and creation of overseas colonies. The wealth of the kingdom allowed the king to raise taxes and pay for the army and the ever costly wars. With these new funds he strengthened France’s army and economy and established outposts in Canada and America. However these are the factors that would soon bring him to his downfall. He led France to the imperialist wars, which, combined with the high levels of taxes led to the failing of the French economy. On top of all that, his unfair taxation of the peasants till 1789 was one the things that lead to the French Revolution.
Louis was always religious, attending mass every day, and was deeply suspicious both of Protestants and of the Jansenists, A Catholic grope founded by the Saint Augustine. However, he had no real interest in theology, and his faithfulness did not stop him adopting a practical- even mercenary- policy in regard to clerical appointments and church lands.
He revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685 which had given religious toleration to the Huguenots. The Huguenots were forced to convert to Catholicism or go to jail. Many of them left the country and with them left much of the prosperity they had created, resulting in problems for the French economy.
Louis also attempted to expand his kingdom. In particular, he would have liked to gain control over what is today Belgium and the Dutch Republic. Because he wanted to expand the borders of France many countries formed an alliance against him. This led to the war of Spanish Succession, where the Dutch Netherlands, England, and Austria fought against Spain and France for the Spanish throne.
Also known as the Spanish Wars, these events led to a further decline of the French economy. And the unjust tax system and migration of the Huguenots only accelerated this decline. 

Frederick the Great


Much like Maria Theresa, Frederick the Great is an example of an absolute monarch who used the power he held to benefit the state. Frederick the Great ruled Prussia from 1740 to 1786. After his accession he at once began the process of consolidation and expansion by invading Silesia, part of the Habsburg empire which resulted in the War of Austrian succession.  He grew the Prussian army which became the 4th largest in Europe. France and Spain supported Prussia while England supported Austria. Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle was signed in 1748 to end the war and Silesia was acquired by Prussia. This made Maria Theresa of Austria upset which led to the 7 year war.
He was an example of an enlightened absolutist in that he displayed unusual religious tolerance, and he also tolerated free expression of the press.
He strengthened the Prussian economy by increasing food exports and mining natural resources. He introduced scientific farming and encouraged farmers from other parts of Europe to come to Prussia. He increased religious tolerance, outlawed torture, and enforced the rule of law.
After his accession he at once began the process of consolidation and expansion by invading Silesia, part of the Habsburg empire which resulted in the War of Austrian succession.  He grew the Prussian army which became the 4th largest in Europe. France and Spain supported Prussia while England supported Austria. Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle was signed in 1748 to end the war and Silesia was acquired by Prussia. This made Maria Theresa of Austria upset which led to the 7 year war.

 Aurangzeb


Aurangzeb has a story much more similar to Ivan the Terrible, his violent tendencies and need for control causing him to drastically worsen country because of his own personal issues. He was the 6th Mughal emperor (1658–1707) and was known as Emperor Alamgir (Conqueror of the Universe). When he was 44 he killed his father Shah Jahan and all his 3 brothers. He was a strict Muslim with no tolerance for other religions. He persecuted Hindus, ordered the closing of their schools, the destructions of their temples and removed them from government service. He created poll tax and other taxes on Hindus. He fought two independent wars in Deccan in the south of India in 1683. This extended the Mughal Empire from Kabul in the north to Cape Comorin to the south.
In 1657 when Shah Jahan the Emperor of India fell really ill his son Dara who was liberal and tolerant was the chosen successor. In 1658 Aurangzeb marched into Agra, captured his father and his brother Dara as well as Dara’s son. He killed Dara and put his head on a platter! He was very intolerant and banned alcohol, dancing, beautiful paintings and writing of historical documents. He banned music in his own court. Aurangzeb’s reign left India in a state of bankruptcy thus making it easy for the British to gain control over India and resulting in the fall of Moghul Empire in India. He removed the tax free status of Hindus that was granted by his grandfather Akbar and spread his vast empire to the south of India. The large empire cost a lot of money and stressed the army and the bureaucracy. After 1680, he acted more like the intolerant leader of an Islamic nation by trying to annex the Marathas kingdoms in the south. The Marathas spread across south India and adopted guerrilla warfare.

From looking at these rulers and the countries they ruled over, it becomes evident that it is not how much power a certain ruler has, but what they do with it that shows the good they can do for their country. Maria Theresa and Frederick the Great did wonderful things with the power they held; they greatly improved the state of their respective countries because they knew what to do with that power. But the others only managed to damage their empires because they simply desired power and knew nothing of the responsibility that came along with it. And so to quote something that has already become far too over-quoted, “with great power comes great responsibility, (Stan Lee)” and it is one’s ability to use that power and understand that responsibility that defines the great things they can do.



References 
"Red Square." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://www.history.com/photos/red-square/photo2>.

"Portrait of the Empress Maria Theresa of Austria (1717-80) - Martin Mytens."Portrait of the Empress Maria Theresa of. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://www.art-prints-on-demand.com/a/mytens-martin/portrait-of-the-empress-m.html>.

"Harmonia Early Music - Indiana Public Media | Music From The Court Of Louis XIV." Harmonia Early Music RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://indianapublicmedia.org/harmonia/music-court-louis-xiv/>.

"No. 2552: Frederick the Great, Patron of the Arts." No. 2552: Frederick the Great, Patron of the Arts. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi2552.htm>.

"The Jagannatha Religion in Mughal Orissa, Part 2." The Sampradaya Sun, 10 June 2012. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://www.harekrsna.com/sun/features/06-12/features2483.htm>.

Young, Kim. Why Absolutism? N.d. You Tube. Web. 14 May 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8lQSNf9TP8>.
   
Damerow, Harold. Louis XIV. Union County College, 10 Oct. 2009. Web. 14 May 2014. <http://academic.mu.edu/meissnerd/ivan-terrible.htm>.

Bobrick, Benson. Fearful Majesty: The Life and Reign of Ivan the Terrible. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1987.

Vinsko, Brian. "Maria Theresa, Archduchess of Austria." Women's History. N.p., 16 Nov. 1998. Web. 14 May 2014. <http://departments.kings.edu/womens_history/mariatheres.html>.

         Harmaan, Susan. Absolute Terror: Ivan The Terrible. Marquette University, n.d. Web. 14 May 2014. <http://academic.mu.edu/meissnerd/ivan-terrible.htm>.


H.M. Scott, ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-Century Europe, (University of Michigan Press, 1990)

Giles MacDonogh, Frederick the Great: A Life in Deed and Letters (2001) p 341

Friday, January 17, 2014

The Mongols


The Beginning of my Journey

I’ve been waiting to go on an expedition for awhile now, but I’m worried about all the stories I have heard about the Mongolians. The people call the Mongolians “bloodthirsty”. I’ve been told that they had a policy. There policy was to spare cities that surrendered, but to show no mercy to those that fought.  I don’t think I should believe them, even though they told me a about Duke Henry when he was trying to escape, but the Mongolians caught him and killed him and put his head on a spear, trophy-like, and they walked around Liegnitz celebrating and having a parade with his head on the spear! It sounds like the story was made up though, because it’s so jerastic and gory. The people also told me that they had a custom to count the all the people they killed. By counting, they would cut off each dead European’s ear and place it in a bag and let the blood drip from the bottom of the bag. They filled nine sacks with ears when they defeated Henry. The Mongols could conquer whoever they wanted to. I heard they conquered Central Asia; all of China; Korea; Persia, Iraq, and Afghanistan; and even Ukraine and Hungary in Eastern Europe. The Mongols defeated Yuri’s sons in battle and burnt Moscow to the ground to show how powerful they were and what they were capable of. I’ve been more convinced that they are stronger and won’t let anyone stop in their way. But I have no choice I’ll have to see it to believe it.

Wish me luck for my journey,
Marco Polo

The return

I’m back from my journey and the Mongols weren’t that bad, they actually improved the trade and the cultural exchanges. They aren’t dangerous if you don’t mess with them, but if you mess with them your ear would be in a bag. Their nomadic way of life caused them to recognize the importance of trade from the very earliest times. The Mongols also had respect and attitude toward the merchants and commerce which was very surprising. They built roads to promote trade and built paper money that was equivalent to the cost of metal. The roads allowed more societies to trade and have different cultures to interact with each other. All I know is that the Mongols actually were good people and were just look down upon. The Mongols made more merchants to trade, because they gave the merchants the benefit of not being faced with confiscatory taxation, which gave the merchants more freedom. I believe that was very interesting and smart of them to do. So the merchants started to give back which I thought was an even deal. The Merchants provided him with information about neighboring cultures, served as diplomats and official traders for the Mongols, and were essential for many needed goods, since the Mongols produced little of their own. I was glad that the stories weren’t the only thing that they were known for or I would not be here telling my story about the generous yet dangerous Mongols.

Sincerely,
Marco Polo


My perspective

Today there are so many perspectives of the Mongols because they are so inconsistent. They do something good like improve the trade and on the other hand they are cutting peoples ears and putting them in bags. I believe that Alexander the Great had similar ideas because they both overcame there enemies with new inventions. Alexander the Great was a man of war and has been known for his new ideas and conquering many lands. Alexander the Great invented new weapons like using “the crossbow” which allowed them to attack their enemies from a distance. The Mongols are also known for the new ways they would fight like using horses in battle to be higher than their opponents.  They also took over many lands and were known for conquering the most land. They both used new ways of fighting to overcome and defeat their opponent and conquer more land to gain power. The Roman Republic was much more different then the Mongolians, because the Roman Republic based your life in what type of class you were born in. While the Mongolians based your life on if you were in the army. So mostly the rich weren’t rich anymore and the poor were very rich. This favored the poor, but it was good and bad at the same time for the whole Mongolian society.

MLA bibliography

"The Mongol Empire (Overview)." World History: Ancient and Medieval Eras. ABC-CLIO, 2014. Web. 14 Jan. 2014. http://ancienthistory.abc-clio.com/Topics/Display/1185656?cid=41&terms=mongolia


"Genghis Khan." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 14 Jan. 2014.http://www.history.com/topics/genghis-khan

"Mongol Invasions: Battle of Liegnitz." History Net Where History Comes Alive World US History Online Mongol Invasions Battle of Liegnitz Comments. Weider History Group, 2013. Web. 15 Jan. 2014.

"The Mongols in World History | Asia Topics in World History." The Mongols in World History | Asia Topics in World History. Asia for Educators, 2004. Web. 16 Jan. 2014.http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/mongols/history/history4.htm